Apr 14, 2009

Valero bets on ethanol production

Valero, the US’s biggest refiner, is making a big bet on ethanol production in spite a sharp drop in demand that has left 21 per cent of US ethanol capacity idle and a rash of bankruptcies in the sector.

The company recently snapped up ethanol assets that have been hammered by the rapid decline in fuel prices that began last autumn. Though the near-term outlook for ethanol remains weak, the company is positioning itself for a rebound in demand that would accompany an uptick in the economy.

Further, the Obama administration appears committed to ethanol, which is required by federal mandates to be blended into the US gasoline supply.

“The mandate is definitely here to stay, definitely through 2020,’’ said Rick Gilmore, chief executive of GIC group, an agribusiness consulting and investment advisory firm.

There is also new money in President Barack Obama’s proposed budget for second and third-generation biofuel plants. But there are risks to Valero’s strategy. It will have to ride out the overcapacity and high feedstock costs that have crippled ethanol groups since gasoline prices began to fall in October.

Yet Valero is seeking to turn those companies’ weaknesses to its advantage. In March, it won a bankruptcy auction for seven VeraSun Energy plants and one development site for $477m, which valued the assets at about 40 per cent of replacement cost.

The assets are among the most competitive ethanol production facilities in the US, in terms of location, scale and efficiency, said Nathan Schaffer, a director at PFC Energy, a consultancy. Mr Schaffer thought Valero’s strategy made sense, though he cautioned that the company would need to learn to manage corn supply costs, a chronic challenge for ethanol producers. “Its real value comes from expanding Valero’s depth in the supply chain at a low price,’’ he said. The low fixed costs of the new subsidiary would give it an edge in navigating an unforgiving ethanol market.

That will enable Valero to produce its own ethanol instead of paying others for it, potentially reducing its Renewable Fuel Standard fulfilment costs by up to $15m annually, Mr Schaffer said.

Valero produced roughly 1.1m barrels of gasoline per day in the US in 2008. Assuming a similar production volume this year, it would incur a 1.7bn gallon ethanol blending requirement. Of this, up to 45 per cent could be met by Valero’s new ethanol production, although the ratio could even be higher if the US gasoline market remains weak.

The poor outlook for ethanol over the next 18 months, combined with the varying or lower quality of other facilities likely to come up for sale, may discourage other refiners from making similar bets on ethanol producers, Mr Schaffer said. But other companies may be tempted by the low asset price set by the transaction.

Analysts caution that it may take time for Valero’s ethanol investment to pay off. Not only has demand for gasoline dropped, but refineries are likely to be hit hard by climate-change legislation proposed by the Obama administration.

“Valero, like all of the refiners, is undergoing a tsunami of change,’’ said Roger Ihne, the energy client portfolio leader for Mid-America at Deloitte Consulting. Some, he suspects, may not be able to make the necessary adjustments to meet impending legislation while remaining competitive.

Yet, in buying the ethanol production facilities, Valero is preparing itself for an increase in renewable mandates in coming years. It also can upgrade the facilities to handle the next-generation cellulosic ethanol once it is developed and other high-grade biofuel blends. “We have the ability to bolt on new technology,’’ said Bill Day, Valero spokesman. In the interim, Valero will suffer from higher regulatory costs and the drop in demand.

“The US refining industry is headed into its Dark Ages and 2009 will likely see refinery closures and bankruptcies,’’ said Mark Flannery, analyst at Credit Suisse Global Energy. “Valero will be a survivor of this period, but getting through it will not be pleasant.’’

By Sheila McNulty in Houston

Published: April 10 2009 20:05 | Last updated: April 10 2009 20:05


Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2009

1 comment:

  1. Conservastore says:
    This is VERY big news we feel. It shows a solid move by a large USA leader of the old oil and gas industry toward a time when all fuels will not be oil and gas based.
    YES the key ingredients of ethanol need to be tweaked as to not compete with foodstuffs but the more large traditional producers get into the act with biofuels the more they will research how costs can be reduced so they will make more money for their shareholders.
    The great benefit of ethanol production is that the large balance of the jobs for it's production come from the Americas and largely can be kept in the USA. In that we currently spend $200billion and countless lives per year on wars to keep the oil and gas flowing, the cost of ethanol produced totally within the shores of the USA then becomes quite a bit cheaper.
    President Obama must stick to his initiatives so that industry will change for the short term and the long term and our way of life will gradually replace oil and gas.